Purpose
Peer Review is the foundation of the scientific method, providing quality control for published research findings. Yet more than 95% of researchers receive no training in this essential skill, forcing them to learn, by trial and error, how to engage in peer review as authors and reviewers. Science Craft’s newest workshop is unique in filling this important skills-gap.
Participants Learn How To:
- Understand and appreciate the roles of the author, reviewer and journal editor.
- Select the best journal for their research and spark the interest of the editor with an engaging cover letter.
- Respond comprehensively and courteously to the reviews.
- Evaluate a research article and phrase criticism constructively.
- Enhance their scientific reputations among journal editors by becoming better reviewers.
Science Craft’s Teaching Approach:
- Reviewer exercises hone critical thinking skills which can also be applied to participants’ own research.
- Trains prospective reviewers to recognise their own unconscious biases.
- Exercises promote an author-reviewer dialogue that is scientific & constructive rather than personalised & nit-picking.
- As homework, participants evaluate a short manuscript describing a fictional research project of general interest.
- Workshop activities are used to explore common ethical issues in peer review.
What Sets This Workshop Apart:
- Participants receive a printed manual guiding them through all steps of the publication process from journal selection to final acceptance of their articles.
- Common myths regarding peer review are re-evaluated using published evidence from the literature.
- To open the “black box” of this topic, participants can select published articles benefitting from Transparent Peer Review for discussion in-class.
- Participants who currently have a manuscript under review can have the reviews and their author response considered for discussion during the workshop.
Maximum Capacity: 10 participants with one instructor
Instructor: Dr. Brian Cusack
Participant Feedback
Should be mandatory for all scientists.
Outstanding, interesting and entertaining.
The workshop is really fantastic. I learned a lot and enjoyed the process as well. Thank you!
The workshop provided me with very interesting insights for both the authors’ and reviewers’ perspectives and helped me to get mentally prepared for the reviewing process in general.
I really liked that your statements were accompanied by real-live examples and also statistics and numbers.
I’m very impressed about the overall quality of the workshop and I learned a lot more than I expected.
I think this will help me enormously in my future work.
Excellent.
It is really amazing, covering all the aspects.
Thank you a lot for your encouragement.
Every prospective author/reviewer should attend this workshop to learn about the process and build skills before they even start their journey.
Informative and fun, great.
The workshop was effective, enjoyable and well-structured; Brian was well-prepared and fostered a good dialogue among the participants.
It was a super informative and interesting workshop. Thank you!
I think it is a really important topic and there is no real training during early career stages, therefore, I found it really useful.
